Friday, July 04, 2008

"But Dad, Which One is God's Word?"

(I read this at Chick Publications and thought it was good.)

"Please turn in your Bibles to..." The pastor began his sermon. One could hear pages turning all over the building. One father watched his son, barely 9 years old, proudly open his Bible. His father had told him, "Make a habit of knowing God's Word for yourself. Never take man's word for what it says. Read it yourself."

The Words Didn't Match

But as the pastor began reading, something was very wrong! The youngster checked to be sure he had the right verse. Yes, that's the one. But the words didn't match! The pastor was reading from a new translation and, to those with limited reading ability, it sounded like another book! The boy glanced at his father, made a helpless gesture and closed his Bible. The father stared at his Bible but he wasn't following either. In his mind he was on the way home trying to answer a little boy's questions without destroying his respect for his pastor or the Word of God. "Which words were really God's words, after all?" he wondered.

All over the auditorium, Bibles could be heard closing. The Word, for which so many had died, would go unread by the people. Instead, they would receive it from the lips of the "holy man," who understood which words were really God's. An overreaction? Maybe. That is, if one accepts the notion that the professional clergy know best about spiritual matters, and are the only ones who can be trusted to find "truth."

As more and more Bible translations are published, fewer people preach the Word with confidence. One says it one way. Another says, "I like mine better. It says..." But what does God say? Can we really choose a Bible which says what we want it to say, and still take it seriously as the Word of God? Modern translations rely upon a Greek text which rests largely on two Catholic manuscripts. One of them is so pathetically marked up with corrections it finally ended up in the trash, where it was found.

Most Agree Beautifully

The other disagrees with the first, and is missing most of chapters 9 through 13 of Hebrews. How convenient that this manuscript neglects to mention we have no further need of priests! However, the vast majority of old manuscripts agree beautifully with each other, are quoted extensively by early church leaders, and are obviously from the text accepted by the early church as correct. These manuscripts combine to form the text from which the King James Bible was translated.

The importance of the King James lies mainly in the fact that it was translated from the true text, and therefore gives us the true and error-free Word of God. Pastors need to recognize that using many translations in the church undermines the people's confidence in the written Word, and thus undermines the whole church. They need one standard text. And it would certainly help to get the right one!

8 comments:

Natalie said...

Thanks for the comment. You guys have a lot of great posts.

Anonymous said...

Amen! to the entire post. With so many people in a quandry about God it is sad that they have to question what is and is not His Word.

lisa ransdell said...

I am currently doing an in-depth study on how many times the NKJV has changed the simple wording of (old) King James Version of Exodus 3:4 of Here am I to Here I am. The only other place of changing the wording that I can find is 1 Samuel 3:4.
The significance of this is that God was always referenced to as I AM in the Old Testament (Exodus 3:14), and NKJV is placing Moses and Samuel on the same footing as God. Lisa B

Cait said...

I read the NLT... pray for my soul

Anonymous said...

this is a reason I am not well with the bible blog you have. I am sick your worshipf the king james bible and your nonsence of it. Listen I am sure of the bible I read and it is not the king james it is one God blessed. The king james is a old good bible and it works but all your side does is knock out the truth of Love and unity. Now your wrong on this topic and focus on the truth of people going to hell at a rate and use your blog to share Jesus or take your hatful unblessed trash heap down I know your guts will not print this on your page b ecause your fools and so baaptist that it blinds you from the bible and the truths of election and other major things

Darrell said...

The importance of the King James lies mainly in the fact that it was translated from the true text, and therefore gives us the true and error-free Word of God.

Fair enough. Then there should never be a reason to reference the original Greek to make a sermon point, right?

A Conservative Christian said...

King James Only for me ^_^

Anne said...

I'm not going to believe the KJV is the ONLY bible everyone should use until you show me which verse it says it is THE version to use.

I still don't understand why it's the "greatest". It was just one of, or the, first...and the only one to be authorized by King James.